Monday, March 12, 2007

To Speak English or Not to Speak English

In the short essay “Don’t Make English Official—Ban It Instead” Dennis Baron argues that if we ban a language that is so difficult to learn that basically people will want to learn to speak it. I can see the point he is trying to make in this argument, but honestly I don’t think most people are not that childish.

True when you are a kid when you are told something is forbidden, most likely you are going to try it out. But for a kid to try to learn a language seems a little absurd to do just because it is forbidden. People who already speak the language will not stop as Barron mention, they will continue to speak it, and teach it to there children, who in turn will teach it to their children. The circle will never end it will just repeat itself.

Banning the language means school will change as well. The new language will be taught, but half the students will still speak English because that’s what they were taught. Trying to teach a first grader a new language in school and when he leaves school he speaks English seems like it will cause issues. Another problem would be, if the teacher is teaching in the new language what then? Will we see a drop in the number of school drop outs because they cannot keep up with the new system?

My final point is Barron said “that today’s non-English-speaking immigrants are picking up English faster than earlier generations of immigrants did.” So why would we want to change a system that seems to be picking up? In my experience trying to change something, that is already working well, to something better always turns out for the worst in most cases. Barron said “negative psychology works with children” but what of everyone else?

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree tryin to ban something that is so common for our culture is a big mistake. Like you said about teaching the new language in the school system and then when they leave they are back speaking english. It will only make up a new kind of language because 9 times out of 10 they are going to combine the language instead of dropping either one, creating a new slang or either a secreate way of comunicating.

Anonymous said...

I agree with you Cody on the aspect that this idea is absurd. But on the other hand I don't think Dennis Baron meant for this essay to be taken in a literal sense.

Anonymous said...

I agree with you Cody on the aspect that this idea is absurd. But on the other hand I don't think Dennis Baron meant for this essay to be taken in a literal sense.

Anonymous said...

I believe that Baron intended for his essay to be satirical, and somewhat humorous. But at the same time bring out and display the real fears people have about other languages. Banning English would quite obviously be a bad idea overall, but it gets attention.

Anonymous said...

I both agree and disagree with you, Cody.

I agree with your point, but I have to say that I disagree when you said "But for a kid to try to learn a language seems a little absurd to do just because it is forbidden." What about kids who are forbidden to use certain vocabulary? It makes it more appealing to them and they use it for it's shock value.

Anonymous said...

It would be difficult to change something that we have been doing for so long. The english language has come too far for a change, but this essay is satirical. This essay is made for attention like Matthew said. It's not serious at all because banning the English language isn't going to happen any time soon.

Anonymous said...

I agree that is would be a little bit drastic to ban English but I do not think Baron was serious. I believe he was trying to get people to think about our language.

He wrote this essay after the House of Representatives made English the official language of the United States. I for one always thought English was our official language and I was not aware that it was not in writing anywhere saying words to that affect.

Anonymous said...

I see you point Jordan, but thats not what I ment. A few forbidden words is nothing to pick up and say when no one is listening, but to pick up a whole language and use it grammatically correct is what I'm getting at. This is where it is absurd to me.

Anonymous said...

I agree with you Cody. Baron's essay is very satirical and he is poking fun at the English language. We all know that there is nothing that can take over speaking English. The fact is that if it was ban people would do everything in there power to use it. That's the comparison that Baron seems to be trying to make.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Charles. Kids would probably combine the 2 languages instead of dropping one, if English was banned.