Crying over a Crisis?
In Verta Mae's essay "The Kitchen Crisis" she brings up several confusing examples about the natures of cooking and kitchens. She starts off citing an absurd and utterly impossible acount of a man with an instant lunch pill and inflatable couch. She happens to be using both of these for the same purpose. To highlight the absurdity of gadgets of the time and to pull readers in to the essay with what is supposed to qualify as humor. Both of these attempts are valid, but the second does not succeed at all. In fact, it simply pushes readers away with how weird it simply is. She then goes on to comment on the nature of kitchens.
She starts with a series of sentences highlighting race in the kitchen, white women apparently having no place as they are too frail, or pampered. She seems almost bitter as she talks about the contributions of blacks to the culinary arts. Primarily the essay turns into a random series of entries about how family and friends should defend the kitchen, and rapscallions will ruin them. Primarily, she concerns herself with vibes, or vibrations, apparently this pseudo real feeling of wellbeing that applies to how people treat kitchens. It also apparently has something to do with the quality of food, if one is loose, relaxed and living, then the food will be better. Each and every one of those claims, down to the last, is subjective and thus impossible to prove. None of these outside the historical aspect she brings to the table can be proven. Notably the evidence she brings from that angle is quite good and rather effective.
Unfortunately for Verta Mae, the essay is drowned in a sea of feelings and chaotic entries. She has no discernible plot outside apparently protecting your kitchen for the sake of purity. All in all, the dialect makes it a hard read, and the points are presented in far too fragmented a manner for it to be effective.
8 comments:
I would have to disagree with you Bryce. I beleive that the kitchen to black people is sacred because that is where they spent most of their time back in the day if they were not out in the fields.
I also think that the world is evolving into a world that is at a quicker pace than it was back in the day when there were slaves.
I feel that most people today whether black or white do spend that much time in the kitchen.
It also seems to be a fact that when you do go to a friends house they may or may not offer you a glass of water.
Latasha, I have to disagree with you. The kitchen is no more sacred to black people than whites. Your comment is as unorganized as Verta Mae's essay. At least Mae did some research. First of all, one slave would not work in both the kitchen and the fields. Jobs were divided up among slaves. Second of all, if the kitchen was sacred to them, would the fields not also be. It just doesn't make any sense.
Also, more than 75% of whites during the Civil War era didn't even own a single slave. Who cooked their dinner? Why isn't the kitchen sacred to them?
By the way, I believe you mean that most people today do NOT spend much time in the kitchen.
-Keep in touch
-I'll be here all week
Latasha, I do not think that people today spend time in the kitchen. If so why is everything instant- instant grits, instant potatoes, instant anything you want?
On the other hand, Matt, it is very true that many whites did not have slaves even though it is a very wide spread idea that all the whites had slaves and treated them unhumanly.
I have to agree with Latasha. I believe that black people do spend much more time in te kitchen then white people.
I believe that black people enjoy staying in the kitchen and preparing food. It's what we do best.
And Matt about the 75% that didn't own slaves why do you think we have so many instant products now? What ethnic group do you think use them the most?
Matt, I agree with you. This is not a racial issue even though Mae played it out to be. I believe that whites and blacks spend an equal amount of time in the kitchen. As for it being sacred.... I don't know any one person that thinks that the kitchen is a sacred place.
-"I'm sorry I had a fight in the middle of your Black Panther Party." --Forrest G
Sorry Latasha, I just read my comment from the other day and realized it definitely sounded a little harsh, I must have been having a bad day.
However, Bettina, I have to disagree with you. I just have a hard time believing that instant food has anything to do with the emancipation of slaves or with race in general.
Furthermore, if instant foods were created because white women no longer had slaves to cook for them, why did it take so long before instant foods became popular? After all, when you think of the 1950's, what comes to your mind? ANSWER: A white housewife who stays at home all day working in the kitchen (making everything from scratch) and keeping the house tidy.
Therefore, I believe that instant foods have nothing to do with race, and everything to do with economics. These instant foods really became popular after the feminism movement. A wife no longer had the amount of time to prepare a meal like she used to, because now she is also out working. The inventors of these instant foods saw an opportunity, and they took advantage of it...it's just basic economics.
I just want to say that I think that a black woman does cook way moore food than the average white woman.
Take for instance, at thinksgiving time which family haves the most food on the table? Therefore, the average black grendmother and mother spend way more time in the kitchen.
I agree with latasha 50% because yes coming from a black family thats mostly what we do is cook.I disgree with you bettina 50%. The reason why I disagree because that is not all black people do is stay in the kitchen. It seems as if you are Stereotyping us black african american.
Post a Comment